https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791384 Money laundering under the PMLA was treated as an independent and continuing offence, so the 2009 inclusion of Prevention of Corruption Act offences in the Schedule did not prevent action against earlier-acquired properties. The Tribunal also found no reliable proof of prior departmental permission or lawful source of funds, and accepted that the appellants failed to explain the acquisition of the assets from known income. Prior police seizure or attachment in the criminal case did not bar provisional attachment under the PMLA, and properties could be attached even if the holders were not named as accused, where they represented proceeds of crime. en-us Thu, 07 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 May 2026 09:50:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791384 Money laundering under the PMLA was treated as an independent and continuing offence, so the 2009 inclusion of Prevention of Corruption Act offences in the Schedule did not prevent action against earlier-acquired properties. The Tribunal also found no reliable proof of prior departmental permission or lawful source of funds, and accepted that the appellants failed to explain the acquisition of the assets from known income. Prior police seizure or attachment in the criminal case did not bar provisional attachment under the PMLA, and properties could be attached even if the holders were not named as accused, where they represented proceeds of crime. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 07 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791384