<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 612 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791410</link>
    <description>Medical reimbursement paid by a company for the critical heart surgery of a full-time employee and promoter-director was treated as allowable business expenditure under the Income-tax Act. The payment was authorised by board resolution, booked under employee benefit expenses, and related to a key person instrumental in the business. Because the treatment was for a prescribed ailment in an approved hospital and the company bore only part of the total cost while the employee funded the balance, the outlay was found commercially expedient and not a personal expense of the company. The disallowance was therefore unsustainable and the addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 09:50:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=900904" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 612 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791410</link>
      <description>Medical reimbursement paid by a company for the critical heart surgery of a full-time employee and promoter-director was treated as allowable business expenditure under the Income-tax Act. The payment was authorised by board resolution, booked under employee benefit expenses, and related to a key person instrumental in the business. Because the treatment was for a prescribed ailment in an approved hospital and the company bore only part of the total cost while the employee funded the balance, the outlay was found commercially expedient and not a personal expense of the company. The disallowance was therefore unsustainable and the addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791410</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>