<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 616 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791414</link>
    <description>Reassessment under the Income-tax Act cannot be sustained where the reopening rests on the same material already examined and finally adjudicated in earlier proceedings. The assessee&#039;s TDS credit and the underlying interest income had already been considered in the appellate order, and the sanction note relied only on figures from the Insight Portal and the existing record without any fresh tangible information or independent basis for escapement. In the absence of new material, the notice under Section 148 was founded on a mere change of opinion and failed the jurisdictional requirement for reopening. The notice and connected sanction note were therefore invalid and liable to be set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 09:50:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=900900" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 616 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791414</link>
      <description>Reassessment under the Income-tax Act cannot be sustained where the reopening rests on the same material already examined and finally adjudicated in earlier proceedings. The assessee&#039;s TDS credit and the underlying interest income had already been considered in the appellate order, and the sanction note relied only on figures from the Insight Portal and the existing record without any fresh tangible information or independent basis for escapement. In the absence of new material, the notice under Section 148 was founded on a mere change of opinion and failed the jurisdictional requirement for reopening. The notice and connected sanction note were therefore invalid and liable to be set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791414</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>