<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 620 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791418</link>
    <description>Shares were treated as genuine investment rather than bogus penny stock transactions, because the investor purchased them to invest and not for frequent short-span trading to earn exempt income. The High Court&#039;s view that the exemption claim under section 10(38) could not be denied on the facts was left undisturbed, as no good ground was found to interfere and the special leave petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 09:50:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=900896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 620 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791418</link>
      <description>Shares were treated as genuine investment rather than bogus penny stock transactions, because the investor purchased them to invest and not for frequent short-span trading to earn exempt income. The High Court&#039;s view that the exemption claim under section 10(38) could not be denied on the facts was left undisturbed, as no good ground was found to interfere and the special leave petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791418</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>