<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 630 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791428</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the order rejecting revocation of cancellation of registration because the petitioner had not been given a further opportunity to respond to the show-cause notice. Without deciding whether the original time for reply was adequate, the Court held that the interest of justice required another opportunity to file objections. The matter was remitted to the authority to consider the petitioner&#039;s reply and pass a fresh order within the stipulated time.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 12:27:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=900886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 630 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791428</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the order rejecting revocation of cancellation of registration because the petitioner had not been given a further opportunity to respond to the show-cause notice. Without deciding whether the original time for reply was adequate, the Court held that the interest of justice required another opportunity to file objections. The matter was remitted to the authority to consider the petitioner&#039;s reply and pass a fresh order within the stipulated time.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791428</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>