<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Treaty-rate relief for dividend distribution tax and allowance of corporate club membership as business expenditure</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99646</link>
    <description>Dividend distribution tax paid on dividends distributed to non-resident shareholders was treated as falling within the more beneficial treaty rate under the India-Japan and India-Thailand DTAA, because the tax was viewed in substance as a tax on dividend income of the shareholder. Following binding precedent, the ITAT accepted the assessee&#039;s challenge to the higher domestic rate for AY 2017-18 and applied the same view to AY 2018-19. It also held that corporate club membership fees were allowable business expenditure under section 37 and not personal expenditure, as the membership served business purposes and the Revenue&#039;s authorities were distinguishable. Both appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 09:50:58 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 09:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=900869" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Treaty-rate relief for dividend distribution tax and allowance of corporate club membership as business expenditure</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99646</link>
      <description>Dividend distribution tax paid on dividends distributed to non-resident shareholders was treated as falling within the more beneficial treaty rate under the India-Japan and India-Thailand DTAA, because the tax was viewed in substance as a tax on dividend income of the shareholder. Following binding precedent, the ITAT accepted the assessee&#039;s challenge to the higher domestic rate for AY 2017-18 and applied the same view to AY 2018-19. It also held that corporate club membership fees were allowable business expenditure under section 37 and not personal expenditure, as the membership served business purposes and the Revenue&#039;s authorities were distinguishable. Both appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 09:50:58 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>