<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Forex loss on FCCBs treated as revenue, but delayed PF and ESI employee contributions remained disallowable.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99640</link>
    <description>Foreign exchange loss on FCCBs was treated as revenue in nature because the borrowing was for business purposes and not shown to relate to acquisition of capital assets; the disallowance of amortised forex loss was deleted. The corresponding increase in book profit under section 115JB also failed once the underlying addition was removed. Delayed employees&#039; contribution to PF and ESI remained disallowable under section 36(1)(va) despite payment before the section 139(1) due date. In reassessment, the Tribunal held that a fresh addition for the same forex loss amounted to double taxation and deleted it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 09:50:58 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 09:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=900863" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Forex loss on FCCBs treated as revenue, but delayed PF and ESI employee contributions remained disallowable.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99640</link>
      <description>Foreign exchange loss on FCCBs was treated as revenue in nature because the borrowing was for business purposes and not shown to relate to acquisition of capital assets; the disallowance of amortised forex loss was deleted. The corresponding increase in book profit under section 115JB also failed once the underlying addition was removed. Delayed employees&#039; contribution to PF and ESI remained disallowable under section 36(1)(va) despite payment before the section 139(1) due date. In reassessment, the Tribunal held that a fresh addition for the same forex loss amounted to double taxation and deleted it.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 09:50:58 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>