<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1798 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468502</link>
    <description>Delay in filing a statutory GST appeal may be condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act where sufficient cause is shown, including a factual explanation such as the secretary&#039;s accident and hospitalization preventing timely action. On those facts, the Court treated the explanation as adequate, held that the appellant was entitled to seek condonation, and directed that the matter be examined on merits rather than rejected on limitation alone.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 May 2026 17:03:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=900844" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1798 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468502</link>
      <description>Delay in filing a statutory GST appeal may be condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act where sufficient cause is shown, including a factual explanation such as the secretary&#039;s accident and hospitalization preventing timely action. On those facts, the Court treated the explanation as adequate, held that the appellant was entitled to seek condonation, and directed that the matter be examined on merits rather than rejected on limitation alone.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468502</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>