<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Transfer pricing comparables and receivables interest: KPO exclusion, LIBOR plus 200 basis points, and case-specific credit period applied.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99608</link>
    <description>Transfer pricing analysis turned on comparability and receivables benchmarking. EClerx Services Limited was excluded as a KPO, and Infosys BPO Limited was excluded because of its large turnover and intangibles; the Tribunal accepted the consistent approach taken in the assessee&#039;s own earlier years and declined remand for fresh benchmarking. Interest on outstanding receivables was upheld at LIBOR plus 200 basis points, following the assessee&#039;s prior year treatment and rejecting the SBI term deposit rate. The 120-day credit period was set aside as case-specific and was to follow the period adopted in the assessee&#039;s own case for AY 2013-14; section 92CE and Rule 10CB were held inapplicable by analogy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 07:32:36 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 07:32:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=900769" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Transfer pricing comparables and receivables interest: KPO exclusion, LIBOR plus 200 basis points, and case-specific credit period applied.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99608</link>
      <description>Transfer pricing analysis turned on comparability and receivables benchmarking. EClerx Services Limited was excluded as a KPO, and Infosys BPO Limited was excluded because of its large turnover and intangibles; the Tribunal accepted the consistent approach taken in the assessee&#039;s own earlier years and declined remand for fresh benchmarking. Interest on outstanding receivables was upheld at LIBOR plus 200 basis points, following the assessee&#039;s prior year treatment and rejecting the SBI term deposit rate. The 120-day credit period was set aside as case-specific and was to follow the period adopted in the assessee&#039;s own case for AY 2013-14; section 92CE and Rule 10CB were held inapplicable by analogy.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 07:32:36 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>