https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16378 Article 226 writ jurisdiction is ordinarily not to be invoked at the first instance where the statute provides a complete alternate remedy, particularly against a reasoned Order-in-Original under the GST framework that requires factual examination and statutory review. The prescribed remedy should usually be followed where the dispute calls for examination of facts, records, and conclusions already drawn, while constitutional intervention remains reserved for narrow exceptions such as absence of jurisdiction, fundamental unfairness, or challenge to the validity of the law. en-us Sat, 09 May 2026 07:14:07 +0530 Sat, 09 May 2026 07:14:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16378 Article 226 writ jurisdiction is ordinarily not to be invoked at the first instance where the statute provides a complete alternate remedy, particularly against a reasoned Order-in-Original under the GST framework that requires factual examination and statutory review. The prescribed remedy should usually be followed where the dispute calls for examination of facts, records, and conclusions already drawn, while constitutional intervention remains reserved for narrow exceptions such as absence of jurisdiction, fundamental unfairness, or challenge to the validity of the law. Articles Goods and Services Tax - GST Sat, 09 May 2026 07:14:07 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16378