<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 509 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791307</link>
    <description>Service receipts reflected in income-tax records and Form 26AS were treated as the reliable basis for fixing taxable value, and the appellant was allowed threshold exemption only to the extent those records showed turnover below the limit; it did not secure complete exemption because admitted short payment remained on the balance taxable value. Non-disclosure of full receipts in service-tax returns was treated as suppression with intent to evade, so extended limitation applied, interest remained payable as a statutory consequence, and penalties under sections 78 and 77(1) were sustained in principle but reduced to the tax and liability finally upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 10:56:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=900735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 509 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791307</link>
      <description>Service receipts reflected in income-tax records and Form 26AS were treated as the reliable basis for fixing taxable value, and the appellant was allowed threshold exemption only to the extent those records showed turnover below the limit; it did not secure complete exemption because admitted short payment remained on the balance taxable value. Non-disclosure of full receipts in service-tax returns was treated as suppression with intent to evade, so extended limitation applied, interest remained payable as a statutory consequence, and penalties under sections 78 and 77(1) were sustained in principle but reduced to the tax and liability finally upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791307</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>