<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 288 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51595</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) lacked jurisdiction to issue show cause notices in cases not involving provisional assessment, as they are not considered proper officers under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal emphasized the specific assignment of functions to officers as the basis for determining proper officer status. The Department&#039;s reliance on a Calcutta High Court judgment was rejected, leading to the dismissal of all appeals due to the absence of proper officer authority for issuing show cause notices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:47:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 288 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51595</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) lacked jurisdiction to issue show cause notices in cases not involving provisional assessment, as they are not considered proper officers under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal emphasized the specific assignment of functions to officers as the basis for determining proper officer status. The Department&#039;s reliance on a Calcutta High Court judgment was rejected, leading to the dismissal of all appeals due to the absence of proper officer authority for issuing show cause notices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>