<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 516 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791314</link>
    <description>A promoter&#039;s revised settlement proposal for Project Estella was rejected because CIRP was ongoing, a resolution plan had already been approved by the CoC, and stakeholders opposed the proposal; the alleged support of an outside developer was found non-binding and financially uncertain. For Project NCR Greens, the promoter was permitted to complete the substantially finished project and hand over the balance units within six months, because prior undertakings, partial possession already given, and homebuyer interests supported that course, but only subject to approval by the majority of the financial creditors, including the concerned bank.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 07:13:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=900728" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 516 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791314</link>
      <description>A promoter&#039;s revised settlement proposal for Project Estella was rejected because CIRP was ongoing, a resolution plan had already been approved by the CoC, and stakeholders opposed the proposal; the alleged support of an outside developer was found non-binding and financially uncertain. For Project NCR Greens, the promoter was permitted to complete the substantially finished project and hand over the balance units within six months, because prior undertakings, partial possession already given, and homebuyer interests supported that course, but only subject to approval by the majority of the financial creditors, including the concerned bank.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791314</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>