<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 520 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791318</link>
    <description>Retention allowance and salary claims during CIRP require legal entitlement and supporting evidence; a payment slip and a managing director&#039;s endorsement were found insufficient to establish enforceable liability. Salary for June 2017 was directed to be paid subject to the stated conditions, while the appeal against the NCLAT order was dismissed and pending applications were disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 07:13:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=900724" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 520 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791318</link>
      <description>Retention allowance and salary claims during CIRP require legal entitlement and supporting evidence; a payment slip and a managing director&#039;s endorsement were found insufficient to establish enforceable liability. Salary for June 2017 was directed to be paid subject to the stated conditions, while the appeal against the NCLAT order was dismissed and pending applications were disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>