https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791319 Interference with the appellate tribunal's order was declined because the approval of the resolution plan was not under challenge and the appellant's grievance had been expressly left open for consideration before the adjudicating authority. The Court held that, in these circumstances, there was no error in the impugned order. The request for condonation of delay was allowed, but that did not alter the merits outcome. The appeal therefore failed. en-us Fri, 24 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 May 2026 07:13:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791319 Interference with the appellate tribunal's order was declined because the approval of the resolution plan was not under challenge and the appellant's grievance had been expressly left open for consideration before the adjudicating authority. The Court held that, in these circumstances, there was no error in the impugned order. The request for condonation of delay was allowed, but that did not alter the merits outcome. The appeal therefore failed. Case-Laws IBC Fri, 24 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791319