https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791320 The dispute concerned whether the appellant could continue occupying the corporate debtor's premises absent proof of tenancy, lease or licence rights, and whether the Adjudicating Authority could direct recovery of those assets for the insolvency process. The NCLAT upheld the direction to vacate and permitted the Resolution Professional to take possession with police assistance if possession was not surrendered within the time granted. The Supreme Court declined to interfere with that view, but allowed the appellant three months to vacate on filing an undertaking to hand over vacant and peaceful possession to the Resolution Professional. en-us Fri, 24 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 May 2026 07:13:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791320 The dispute concerned whether the appellant could continue occupying the corporate debtor's premises absent proof of tenancy, lease or licence rights, and whether the Adjudicating Authority could direct recovery of those assets for the insolvency process. The NCLAT upheld the direction to vacate and permitted the Resolution Professional to take possession with police assistance if possession was not surrendered within the time granted. The Supreme Court declined to interfere with that view, but allowed the appellant three months to vacate on filing an undertaking to hand over vacant and peaceful possession to the Resolution Professional. Case-Laws IBC Fri, 24 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791320