<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1927 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468482</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit cannot be denied on supplementary invoices reflecting differential duty paid by a registered manufacturer where the inputs were received duty-paid and used in manufacture of final products. The Tribunal treated Rule 9(1)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 as procedural and held that a technical objection about the form of the documents could not override the substantive entitlement to credit. Because the invoices evidenced actual duty payment and the core conditions for credit were satisfied, denial of credit on that ground was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 21:01:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=900668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1927 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468482</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit cannot be denied on supplementary invoices reflecting differential duty paid by a registered manufacturer where the inputs were received duty-paid and used in manufacture of final products. The Tribunal treated Rule 9(1)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 as procedural and held that a technical objection about the form of the documents could not override the substantive entitlement to credit. Because the invoices evidenced actual duty payment and the core conditions for credit were satisfied, denial of credit on that ground was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468482</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>