<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1776 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468486</link>
    <description>A two-day delay in filing the appeal was held satisfactorily explained on the materials placed before the NCLAT. The delay application was supported by the stated reasons, and the respondents raised no opposition. On that basis, the tribunal condoned the delay and allowed the application, permitting the appeal to proceed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 21:01:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=900664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1776 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468486</link>
      <description>A two-day delay in filing the appeal was held satisfactorily explained on the materials placed before the NCLAT. The delay application was supported by the stated reasons, and the respondents raised no opposition. On that basis, the tribunal condoned the delay and allowed the application, permitting the appeal to proceed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468486</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>