<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1693 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468472</link>
    <description>Notice was issued on the application for condonation of delay in filing the civil appeal, and notice was also issued on the appeal itself. Counsel for the respondent accepted notice. The order records only these procedural directions and does not decide the merits of the central excise dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 10:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=900598" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1693 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468472</link>
      <description>Notice was issued on the application for condonation of delay in filing the civil appeal, and notice was also issued on the appeal itself. Counsel for the respondent accepted notice. The order records only these procedural directions and does not decide the merits of the central excise dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>