<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 431 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791229</link>
    <description>The writ petition was disposed of at the motion stage with liberty to move a petition under the Bengal Public Demand Recovery Act before the Certificate Officer. The Certificate Officer was directed to consider the petition on merits and not reject it solely because of delay. The operation of any unexecuted warrant of arrest was stayed for the limited period fixed in the order, preserving interim protection while the statutory remedy was pursued.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 07:29:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=900585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 431 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791229</link>
      <description>The writ petition was disposed of at the motion stage with liberty to move a petition under the Bengal Public Demand Recovery Act before the Certificate Officer. The Certificate Officer was directed to consider the petition on merits and not reject it solely because of delay. The operation of any unexecuted warrant of arrest was stayed for the limited period fixed in the order, preserving interim protection while the statutory remedy was pursued.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791229</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>