<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 144 - CEGAT, COURT NO. IV, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51576</link>
    <description>The tribunal classified the product &#039;Rice &amp;amp; Spice&#039; as a distinct edible preparation under Heading 21.08, subject to excise duty. The appellant&#039;s argument that the product should be classified under the milling industry was rejected. The tribunal determined the assessable value by deducting the duty element and imposed a penalty of Rs. 50,000 on the appellant. The decision was based on judicial precedents supporting the classification and liability for excise duty, ultimately ruling in favor of the respondent and affirming the appellant&#039;s obligation to pay the recalculated duty amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:08:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 144 - CEGAT, COURT NO. IV, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51576</link>
      <description>The tribunal classified the product &#039;Rice &amp;amp; Spice&#039; as a distinct edible preparation under Heading 21.08, subject to excise duty. The appellant&#039;s argument that the product should be classified under the milling industry was rejected. The tribunal determined the assessable value by deducting the duty element and imposed a penalty of Rs. 50,000 on the appellant. The decision was based on judicial precedents supporting the classification and liability for excise duty, ultimately ruling in favor of the respondent and affirming the appellant&#039;s obligation to pay the recalculated duty amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51576</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>