https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791288 The High Court declined to examine the merits of the challenge to the order-in-original and DRC-07, as the petitioner was to pursue the statutory appellate remedy. It granted liberty to file an appeal within two weeks with the required pre-deposit and a delay condonation application, leaving all factual and legal grounds open for the appellate authority. The question of delay was directed to be considered in accordance with law. To preserve the efficacy of the appellate remedy, the Court restrained coercive steps only for the period available to file the appeal. en-us Mon, 06 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 May 2026 07:30:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791288 The High Court declined to examine the merits of the challenge to the order-in-original and DRC-07, as the petitioner was to pursue the statutory appellate remedy. It granted liberty to file an appeal within two weeks with the required pre-deposit and a delay condonation application, leaving all factual and legal grounds open for the appellate authority. The question of delay was directed to be considered in accordance with law. To preserve the efficacy of the appellate remedy, the Court restrained coercive steps only for the period available to file the appeal. Case-Laws GST Mon, 06 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791288