https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791294 Writ jurisdiction was declined because an efficacious statutory appeal under the CGST framework was available and the Appellate Tribunal had become functional. Once the alternate remedy became effective and appropriate for the petitioner to pursue, the basis for entertaining the writ petition no longer existed. The petitioner was therefore directed to proceed before the CGST Appellate Tribunal, and the impugned appellate order was left to be worked out through the statutory appellate mechanism without merits adjudication in writ proceedings. en-us Mon, 04 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 May 2026 07:30:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791294 Writ jurisdiction was declined because an efficacious statutory appeal under the CGST framework was available and the Appellate Tribunal had become functional. Once the alternate remedy became effective and appropriate for the petitioner to pursue, the basis for entertaining the writ petition no longer existed. The petitioner was therefore directed to proceed before the CGST Appellate Tribunal, and the impugned appellate order was left to be worked out through the statutory appellate mechanism without merits adjudication in writ proceedings. Case-Laws GST Mon, 04 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791294