<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 497 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791295</link>
    <description>Where an effective statutory appellate remedy is available under the CGST Act, a writ petition need not be entertained on merits. The High Court noted that the Appellate Tribunal was functional and that the petitioner could pursue the prescribed appeal under Section 112. As the petitioner had already deposited the disputed amount in the Court Registry and would need to make the statutory deposit before the Tribunal, the Court directed release of the deposited sum with accrued interest, if any, to facilitate the appeal. The challenge was therefore not adjudicated substantively, and the petitioner was left to the statutory appellate forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 07:30:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=900519" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 497 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791295</link>
      <description>Where an effective statutory appellate remedy is available under the CGST Act, a writ petition need not be entertained on merits. The High Court noted that the Appellate Tribunal was functional and that the petitioner could pursue the prescribed appeal under Section 112. As the petitioner had already deposited the disputed amount in the Court Registry and would need to make the statutory deposit before the Tribunal, the Court directed release of the deposited sum with accrued interest, if any, to facilitate the appeal. The challenge was therefore not adjudicated substantively, and the petitioner was left to the statutory appellate forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791295</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>