<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 share manipulation probe: SEBI court fines 2 directors, their 5 firms for failing to give info</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=72690</link>
    <description>Failure to comply with regulatory summons and furnish transaction records during a market-manipulation investigation was treated as a separate compliance offence, even though the underlying inquiry concerned alleged price manipulation in shares of BPL, Videocon and related securities. The proceedings arose from SEBI&#039;s 1998 investigation into abnormal price movements and trading volumes, in which brokers were found to have dealt primarily for a common set of client entities connected with the Damayanti Group. The explanation that the entities were controlled by Harshad Mehta and operated without the directors&#039; knowledge was not accepted as a defence to non-compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 22:16:04 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 22:16:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=900488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 share manipulation probe: SEBI court fines 2 directors, their 5 firms for failing to give info</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=72690</link>
      <description>Failure to comply with regulatory summons and furnish transaction records during a market-manipulation investigation was treated as a separate compliance offence, even though the underlying inquiry concerned alleged price manipulation in shares of BPL, Videocon and related securities. The proceedings arose from SEBI&#039;s 1998 investigation into abnormal price movements and trading volumes, in which brokers were found to have dealt primarily for a common set of client entities connected with the Damayanti Group. The explanation that the entities were controlled by Harshad Mehta and operated without the directors&#039; knowledge was not accepted as a defence to non-compliance.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 22:16:04 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=72690</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>