https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468464 Where a first appeal turns substantially on the identity and boundaries of immovable property, substantial compliance with Order XLI Rule 31 of the Code of Civil Procedure is sufficient if the appellate court identifies the core issue, gives reasons, and leaves further questions open pending proper evidence. In such a dispute, local investigation under Order XXVI Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure is an appropriate course to clarify the suit property and prevent prejudice. The remand directing appointment of a commissioner was therefore treated as valid, and the challenge to the remand order failed because further factual elucidation was needed before final adjudication. en-us Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 May 2026 17:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468464 Where a first appeal turns substantially on the identity and boundaries of immovable property, substantial compliance with Order XLI Rule 31 of the Code of Civil Procedure is sufficient if the appellate court identifies the core issue, gives reasons, and leaves further questions open pending proper evidence. In such a dispute, local investigation under Order XXVI Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure is an appropriate course to clarify the suit property and prevent prejudice. The remand directing appointment of a commissioner was therefore treated as valid, and the challenge to the remand order failed because further factual elucidation was needed before final adjudication. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468464