<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 1764 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468462</link>
    <description>Mechanical approval under Section 153D of the Income-tax Act, granted without application of mind, vitiated the assessment; the defect was not cured by Section 292B. The Delhi HC relied on its earlier view sustaining annulment on the same basis and treated the Tribunal&#039;s finding as factual. On that footing, the revenue&#039;s challenge did not raise any substantial question of law, so the appeal was not entertained and was closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 17:06:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=900449" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 1764 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468462</link>
      <description>Mechanical approval under Section 153D of the Income-tax Act, granted without application of mind, vitiated the assessment; the defect was not cured by Section 292B. The Delhi HC relied on its earlier view sustaining annulment on the same basis and treated the Tribunal&#039;s finding as factual. On that footing, the revenue&#039;s challenge did not raise any substantial question of law, so the appeal was not entertained and was closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>