<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 1405 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468461</link>
    <description>Invocation of section 153C requires a specific satisfaction note by the Assessing Officer of the searched person linking the seized material to the income of the other person; a general reference to search material is insufficient. Because the satisfaction note did not refer to the material on which the addition was ultimately based, the jurisdictional precondition was not met and the assessment was quashed as without authority of law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 16:03:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=900444" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 1405 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468461</link>
      <description>Invocation of section 153C requires a specific satisfaction note by the Assessing Officer of the searched person linking the seized material to the income of the other person; a general reference to search material is insufficient. Because the satisfaction note did not refer to the material on which the addition was ultimately based, the jurisdictional precondition was not met and the assessment was quashed as without authority of law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468461</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>