<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 1561 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468459</link>
    <description>Rectification under section 254(2) is limited to an obvious mistake apparent from the record and cannot be used to review, reopen, or reappreciate the earlier order. Because the Department did not identify any such mistake in the order dated 31/08/2021, the Tribunal held that the miscellaneous applications fell outside its narrow rectification jurisdiction and were not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 14:56:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=900438" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 1561 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468459</link>
      <description>Rectification under section 254(2) is limited to an obvious mistake apparent from the record and cannot be used to review, reopen, or reappreciate the earlier order. Because the Department did not identify any such mistake in the order dated 31/08/2021, the Tribunal held that the miscellaneous applications fell outside its narrow rectification jurisdiction and were not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>