https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468453 Advocates have no legal right to strike or boycott courts under Article 19(1)(a), because accepting briefs carries a duty to appear and abstention obstructs the administration of justice and litigants' access to speedy adjudication. The freedom of speech and expression cannot be used to justify a court boycott at the expense of the justice delivery system. Directions aimed at curbing boycotts, ensuring listing of matters, securing police assistance where necessary, and initiating disciplinary action against persistent unprofessional conduct were held permissible as measures to preserve uninterrupted court functioning and protect access to justice. en-us Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 May 2026 11:08:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468453 Advocates have no legal right to strike or boycott courts under Article 19(1)(a), because accepting briefs carries a duty to appear and abstention obstructs the administration of justice and litigants' access to speedy adjudication. The freedom of speech and expression cannot be used to justify a court boycott at the expense of the justice delivery system. Directions aimed at curbing boycotts, ensuring listing of matters, securing police assistance where necessary, and initiating disciplinary action against persistent unprofessional conduct were held permissible as measures to preserve uninterrupted court functioning and protect access to justice. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468453