<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 375 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791173</link>
    <description>Prolonged custody, an unframed-charge stage, and the likelihood of a lengthy trial justified release on bail where the accused stood on the same footing as co-accused already enlarged on bail. The Supreme Court took an overall view that continued incarceration was not justified for bail purposes and granted bail, subject to furnishing bail bonds and complying with the trial court&#039;s conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 07:07:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=900392" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 375 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791173</link>
      <description>Prolonged custody, an unframed-charge stage, and the likelihood of a lengthy trial justified release on bail where the accused stood on the same footing as co-accused already enlarged on bail. The Supreme Court took an overall view that continued incarceration was not justified for bail purposes and granted bail, subject to furnishing bail bonds and complying with the trial court&#039;s conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791173</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>