<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 376 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791174</link>
    <description>Regular bail under section 45 of the PML Act was discussed in the context of the twin conditions for bail, with the petitioner having been granted bail subject to specified conditions. Delay in filing was condoned, and the Supreme Court declined to interfere with the High Court&#039;s orders, dismissing the special leave petitions. Liberty was reserved to approach the High Court for appropriate orders if any bail condition was breached by respondent No. 1.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 07:07:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=900391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 376 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791174</link>
      <description>Regular bail under section 45 of the PML Act was discussed in the context of the twin conditions for bail, with the petitioner having been granted bail subject to specified conditions. Delay in filing was condoned, and the Supreme Court declined to interfere with the High Court&#039;s orders, dismissing the special leave petitions. Liberty was reserved to approach the High Court for appropriate orders if any bail condition was breached by respondent No. 1.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791174</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>