<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 203 - CEGAT, COURT NO. II, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51561</link>
    <description>Tariff classification of nitrided low carbon ferro manganese was determined by chemical composition and expert test results, not merely by the importer&#039;s description. The Tribunal accepted the test report and chemical examiner&#039;s opinion that the material was other than ferro manganese and classified it under Chapter heading 81.11. In a separate jurisdiction point, it held that where goods are cleared under provisional assessment, the proper officer may finalise assessment by show cause notice, so the Deputy Commissioner had competence to issue the notice. The department&#039;s classification and jurisdictional stance were therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 14:04:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90039" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 203 - CEGAT, COURT NO. II, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51561</link>
      <description>Tariff classification of nitrided low carbon ferro manganese was determined by chemical composition and expert test results, not merely by the importer&#039;s description. The Tribunal accepted the test report and chemical examiner&#039;s opinion that the material was other than ferro manganese and classified it under Chapter heading 81.11. In a separate jurisdiction point, it held that where goods are cleared under provisional assessment, the proper officer may finalise assessment by show cause notice, so the Deputy Commissioner had competence to issue the notice. The department&#039;s classification and jurisdictional stance were therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>