https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791176 A competition regulator must give notice and an opportunity of rebuttal before it relies on conclusions or directions that materially depart from the Director General's report. Where the Commission proposed disclosure of the discount policy and other directions inconsistent with the report's findings, the affected party was entitled to meet the proposed deviation. The absence of such notice and hearing caused prejudice and violated natural justice, rendering the order unsustainable. The matter was therefore remanded for fresh consideration after notice wherever the Commission differs from the Director General's findings. en-us Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 May 2026 07:07:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791176 A competition regulator must give notice and an opportunity of rebuttal before it relies on conclusions or directions that materially depart from the Director General's report. Where the Commission proposed disclosure of the discount policy and other directions inconsistent with the report's findings, the affected party was entitled to meet the proposed deviation. The absence of such notice and hearing caused prejudice and violated natural justice, rendering the order unsustainable. The matter was therefore remanded for fresh consideration after notice wherever the Commission differs from the Director General's findings. Case-Laws Law of Competition Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791176