https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791185 Classification of quicklime was treated as settled against the Revenue because the Tribunal had relied on its earlier view in Viraj Profiles Ltd., and that view had already been upheld by the Supreme Court. Accepting the appellant's statement on that position, the Court declined to interfere and dismissed the appeals. The pending applications were also disposed of accordingly. en-us Mon, 04 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 May 2026 07:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791185 Classification of quicklime was treated as settled against the Revenue because the Tribunal had relied on its earlier view in Viraj Profiles Ltd., and that view had already been upheld by the Supreme Court. Accepting the appellant's statement on that position, the Court declined to interfere and dismissed the appeals. The pending applications were also disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 04 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791185