<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 420 - APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, TAMILNADU</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791218</link>
    <description>Where an appeal introduces a factual matrix materially different from the facts placed before the original advance ruling authority, the appellate authority cannot properly test the correctness of the ruling on the existing record. The appropriate course is remand for fresh adjudication on the corrected factual foundation, with observance of natural justice. The matter was therefore sent back to the original authority for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 07:08:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=900347" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 420 - APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, TAMILNADU</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791218</link>
      <description>Where an appeal introduces a factual matrix materially different from the facts placed before the original advance ruling authority, the appellate authority cannot properly test the correctness of the ruling on the existing record. The appropriate course is remand for fresh adjudication on the corrected factual foundation, with observance of natural justice. The matter was therefore sent back to the original authority for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791218</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>