<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 422 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791220</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging a GST adjudication order was treated as not maintainable where an effective statutory appeal was available under Section 107(1) of the CGST Act, 2017. The Court held that the existence of an appellate forum was a sufficient reason to decline exercise of writ jurisdiction, and the petitioner was left to pursue the statutory appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 07:08:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=900345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 422 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791220</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging a GST adjudication order was treated as not maintainable where an effective statutory appeal was available under Section 107(1) of the CGST Act, 2017. The Court held that the existence of an appellate forum was a sufficient reason to decline exercise of writ jurisdiction, and the petitioner was left to pursue the statutory appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791220</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>