<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 425 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791223</link>
    <description>A writ petition under GST was declined where an efficacious statutory appeal before the GST Appellate Tribunal was available and functioning. The Court applied the alternate-remedy rule and found no pleaded exception, as there was no allegation of violation of natural justice, lack of jurisdiction, or challenge to the vires of any statute. The dispute was held to be one for the appellate forum, and the petitioner was relegated to the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 07:08:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=900342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 425 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791223</link>
      <description>A writ petition under GST was declined where an efficacious statutory appeal before the GST Appellate Tribunal was available and functioning. The Court applied the alternate-remedy rule and found no pleaded exception, as there was no allegation of violation of natural justice, lack of jurisdiction, or challenge to the vires of any statute. The dispute was held to be one for the appellate forum, and the petitioner was relegated to the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>