<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 2010 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468449</link>
    <description>Penalty proceedings based solely on a quashed assessment order cannot survive once the assessment is set aside, because the foundation for the consequential penalty action disappears. On that reasoning, the Madras High Court held that the impugned penalty order was unsustainable and set it aside. The writ petition therefore succeeded, and the penalty proceedings were annulled in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 18:55:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=900301" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 2010 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468449</link>
      <description>Penalty proceedings based solely on a quashed assessment order cannot survive once the assessment is set aside, because the foundation for the consequential penalty action disappears. On that reasoning, the Madras High Court held that the impugned penalty order was unsustainable and set it aside. The writ petition therefore succeeded, and the penalty proceedings were annulled in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>