<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 259 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791057</link>
    <description>A complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act may proceed where a cheque was issued towards another legally enforceable liability, because Sections 138 and 139 refer to &quot;any cheque&quot; and raise a presumption that it was issued for discharge of a debt or other liability. At the quashing stage, absence of privity, reliance on a settlement, and the plea of a without prejudice arrangement or gift raised disputed factual issues that could not be finally resolved. Where the complaint and supporting documents disclosed a prima facie case and the statutory presumption remained unrebutted, process could not be quashed against the accused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 08:32:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=900196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 259 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791057</link>
      <description>A complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act may proceed where a cheque was issued towards another legally enforceable liability, because Sections 138 and 139 refer to &quot;any cheque&quot; and raise a presumption that it was issued for discharge of a debt or other liability. At the quashing stage, absence of privity, reliance on a settlement, and the plea of a without prejudice arrangement or gift raised disputed factual issues that could not be finally resolved. Where the complaint and supporting documents disclosed a prima facie case and the statutory presumption remained unrebutted, process could not be quashed against the accused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791057</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>