<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 264 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791062</link>
    <description>An incorporated cooperative society providing lending and deposit-related services exclusively to its members was treated as outside the service tax net for the relevant period under the principle of mutuality. The Tribunal followed the view that such a society is an incorporated entity and that member-only services, in the statutory context using the expressions &quot;body of persons&quot; and &quot;person,&quot; did not amount to taxable service under Banking and Other Financial Services. It also relied on an earlier batch decision involving similar cooperative societies. The impugned tax demand, confirmation of tax, and penalties were unsustainable, and the order was set aside with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 08:32:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=900191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 264 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791062</link>
      <description>An incorporated cooperative society providing lending and deposit-related services exclusively to its members was treated as outside the service tax net for the relevant period under the principle of mutuality. The Tribunal followed the view that such a society is an incorporated entity and that member-only services, in the statutory context using the expressions &quot;body of persons&quot; and &quot;person,&quot; did not amount to taxable service under Banking and Other Financial Services. It also relied on an earlier batch decision involving similar cooperative societies. The impugned tax demand, confirmation of tax, and penalties were unsustainable, and the order was set aside with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791062</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>