<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (5) TMI 180 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51540</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on inputs used to manufacture bus-bar was held admissible because the bus-bar was treated as a captively consumed intermediate product, not a final cleared product. Its exemption under Notification No. 67/95-C.E. did not by itself bar credit, and Rule 57C objection failed. Credit remained available under Rule 57D(2) for inputs used in manufacture of the intermediate product, so the demand and penalty were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 12:59:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (5) TMI 180 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51540</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on inputs used to manufacture bus-bar was held admissible because the bus-bar was treated as a captively consumed intermediate product, not a final cleared product. Its exemption under Notification No. 67/95-C.E. did not by itself bar credit, and Rule 57C objection failed. Credit remained available under Rule 57D(2) for inputs used in manufacture of the intermediate product, so the demand and penalty were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>