<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 285 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791083</link>
    <description>Declared import value cannot be rejected on the basis of a bare Chartered Engineer&#039;s estimate unless supported by evidence of undervaluation, comparable contemporaneous imports, or extra consideration. Here, the report lacked supporting material, so re-determination of assessable value was not sustainable. Confiscation and penalties also could not be upheld where the authorities treated the goods as incomplete or prohibited computer systems without a sound technical basis showing that cabinet cases with motherboard and fan, but without CPU, had the essential character of a computer system. In the absence of adequate technical evidence, the importer&#039;s declaration could not be displaced and the consequential confiscation and penalties failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 08:32:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=900170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 285 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791083</link>
      <description>Declared import value cannot be rejected on the basis of a bare Chartered Engineer&#039;s estimate unless supported by evidence of undervaluation, comparable contemporaneous imports, or extra consideration. Here, the report lacked supporting material, so re-determination of assessable value was not sustainable. Confiscation and penalties also could not be upheld where the authorities treated the goods as incomplete or prohibited computer systems without a sound technical basis showing that cabinet cases with motherboard and fan, but without CPU, had the essential character of a computer system. In the absence of adequate technical evidence, the importer&#039;s declaration could not be displaced and the consequential confiscation and penalties failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791083</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>