<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 297 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791095</link>
    <description>External Development Charges paid to HUDA were treated as payments attracting tax deduction at source under section 194C, following the Delhi High Court view in Puri Construction Pvt. Ltd. Because no contrary authority was shown, the demand raised under section 201(1) read with section 201(1A) for non-deduction of tax at source was upheld, and the first appellate authority&#039;s deletion was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 08:32:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=900158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 297 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791095</link>
      <description>External Development Charges paid to HUDA were treated as payments attracting tax deduction at source under section 194C, following the Delhi High Court view in Puri Construction Pvt. Ltd. Because no contrary authority was shown, the demand raised under section 201(1) read with section 201(1A) for non-deduction of tax at source was upheld, and the first appellate authority&#039;s deletion was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791095</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>