<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (6) TMI 132 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51536</link>
    <description>Where a CHA enquiry under Regulation 23 had already commenced, suspension of the licence was not sustained as an appropriate measure under the regulatory scheme. The Tribunal noted that suspension or revocation is contemplated in connection with such an enquiry, and that delaying completion of the enquiry could prejudice the CHA&#039;s commercial interests. On that basis, the suspension order was set aside and the licence suspension was revoked.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 12:43:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90014" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (6) TMI 132 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51536</link>
      <description>Where a CHA enquiry under Regulation 23 had already commenced, suspension of the licence was not sustained as an appropriate measure under the regulatory scheme. The Tribunal noted that suspension or revocation is contemplated in connection with such an enquiry, and that delaying completion of the enquiry could prejudice the CHA&#039;s commercial interests. On that basis, the suspension order was set aside and the licence suspension was revoked.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51536</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>