https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791127 Writ jurisdiction will ordinarily not be exercised to bypass an efficacious statutory appellate remedy already invoked and pending before a competent forum. Because the petitioner had filed an appeal and a stay application before the Tribunal, which was functional and seized of the dispute, no exceptional circumstance justified interference under writ powers. The writ petition was therefore not maintainable and was dismissed, with the petitioner left to pursue the pending appellate proceedings and the stay application expected to be decided expeditiously. en-us Wed, 29 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 May 2026 08:32:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791127 Writ jurisdiction will ordinarily not be exercised to bypass an efficacious statutory appellate remedy already invoked and pending before a competent forum. Because the petitioner had filed an appeal and a stay application before the Tribunal, which was functional and seized of the dispute, no exceptional circumstance justified interference under writ powers. The writ petition was therefore not maintainable and was dismissed, with the petitioner left to pursue the pending appellate proceedings and the stay application expected to be decided expeditiously. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 29 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791127