<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 335 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791133</link>
    <description>Reassessment notice and initiation of reassessment proceedings were challenged as barred by limitation on the basis that they were issued beyond six years, both under the old Act and under the amended Section 147. The High Court treated the limitation objection as raising a jurisdictional issue and found a prima facie case for interim relief, directing adjudication after affidavits. The Supreme Court found no good ground to interfere with that order and dismissed the special leave petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 08:32:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=900120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 335 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791133</link>
      <description>Reassessment notice and initiation of reassessment proceedings were challenged as barred by limitation on the basis that they were issued beyond six years, both under the old Act and under the amended Section 147. The High Court treated the limitation objection as raising a jurisdictional issue and found a prima facie case for interim relief, directing adjudication after affidavits. The Supreme Court found no good ground to interfere with that order and dismissed the special leave petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791133</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>