<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 341 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791139</link>
    <description>The writ petition was not entertained because an alternative statutory remedy was available before the GST Appellate Tribunal. The court granted liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal within the prescribed window period, leaving the statutory appellate route open for challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 08:32:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=900114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 341 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791139</link>
      <description>The writ petition was not entertained because an alternative statutory remedy was available before the GST Appellate Tribunal. The court granted liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal within the prescribed window period, leaving the statutory appellate route open for challenge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791139</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>