<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 354 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791152</link>
    <description>A writ petition concerning refund of alleged excess GST arising from transition from VAT to GST was disposed of with liberty to file a detailed representation supported by particulars. The authority was directed to consider the refund claim and, if any amount was found due, to refund it within eight weeks. The document reflects a limited procedural remedy of fresh consideration and consequential payment, without any broader adjudication on entitlement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 18:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=900101" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 354 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791152</link>
      <description>A writ petition concerning refund of alleged excess GST arising from transition from VAT to GST was disposed of with liberty to file a detailed representation supported by particulars. The authority was directed to consider the refund claim and, if any amount was found due, to refund it within eight weeks. The document reflects a limited procedural remedy of fresh consideration and consequential payment, without any broader adjudication on entitlement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>