<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 355 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791153</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging an adjudication order and related proceedings was declined because an efficacious statutory appeal was available under Section 107(1) of the CGST Act. The petitioner&#039;s grievance included denial of cross-examination, but the Court held that the existence of an alternate appellate remedy weighed against writ interference. The petition was therefore not entertained and was dismissed, while leaving the petitioner free to pursue the statutory appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 08:32:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=900100" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 355 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791153</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging an adjudication order and related proceedings was declined because an efficacious statutory appeal was available under Section 107(1) of the CGST Act. The petitioner&#039;s grievance included denial of cross-examination, but the Court held that the existence of an alternate appellate remedy weighed against writ interference. The petition was therefore not entertained and was dismissed, while leaving the petitioner free to pursue the statutory appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>